View a markdown version of this page

Strategy and challenges - Guidance for an Automotive Data Platform on AWS

Strategy and challenges

Modernizing Your Automotive Data Strategy

This document provides a data strategy for automotive executives. The strategy includes procedural, organizational, and technical guidance for leaders who want to advance the mission of their organization by making it more data-driven.

Overview

As an automotive executive, you work in a challenging environment where vehicle data is growing exponentially in size, variety, and complexity. Connected vehicles generate terabytes of telemetry data daily, while customer interactions span sales, service, warranty, and digital touchpoints. Engineering teams need more data, more quickly, to accelerate product development and improve vehicle quality. Regulatory compliance requires increased rigor around data handling and data sharing, particularly with new regulations like the EU Data Act mandating customer access to vehicle-generated data. Sophisticated bad actors frequently threaten data security, targeting both vehicle systems and enterprise data. Despite these challenges, you must improve customer experience and vehicle quality, make data available for product innovation and autonomous vehicle development, and optimize costs so that you can sustain your organization over the long term. This document presents how you can use a modern data mesh architecture to address these challenges and meet your goals.

A modern automotive data strategy can help organizational leaders meet many strategic objectives. It can help your organization improve across all aspects of the automotive value chain:

  • Customer Experience: Enhance communication and optimize access to vehicle data, service history, and personalized recommendations

  • Engineering Excellence: Make data accessible for R&D, quality improvement, and accelerated product development cycles

  • Operational Efficiency: Drive cost reductions through workflow automation while improving efficiency and access to critical information for decision-makers

  • Product Innovation: Enable advanced features like predictive maintenance, over-the-air updates, and autonomous driving through comprehensive data integration

  • Competitive Advantage: Transform vehicle and customer data into insights that differentiate your brand and create new revenue streams

A cohesive, multimodal data strategy considers the entirety of a customer’s experience with your vehicles and brand—from initial research and purchase through ownership, service, and eventual trade-in or resale.

Data Challenges of Automotive Organizations

To provide optimal experiences for customers and insights that help engineering teams make good product decisions, automotive teams need high-quality data about vehicles, customers, and operations. Delivering the right data, in the right format, to the right person at the right time, is challenging for automotive IT, especially given the ethical and regulatory requirements for vehicle data handling. In addition, automotive innovations are constantly increasing the amount and complexity of vehicle data. According to industry analysts, connected vehicles generate up to 25 gigabytes of data per hour. By 2030, the global automotive data market is expected to exceed 750 billion dollars annually. Traditional automotive data-processing strategies struggle to support this rapid increase in data volume and complexity.

Many automotive organizations are improving customer outcomes by using predictive analytics. Organizations are also using advanced machine learning for autonomous driving, which requires processing massive amounts of sensor data in real-time while considering individual differences in driving patterns, road conditions, and vehicle configurations. Autonomous vehicle development is accelerating innovation, but it’s also creating novel data-processing challenges for automotive organizations. Standard approaches are also difficult to scale beyond single-vehicle testing to fleet-wide deployment. Automotive organizations must reduce the time from acquiring raw telemetry data to delivering actionable insights to engineering teams, service technicians, and customers. That information must be accurate, and it must be presented in a form that stakeholders can easily access, understand, and apply.

Automotive data is irreplaceable and is a highly valuable asset of many automotive organizations. Therefore, you must treat automotive data as an asset. Your automotive organization must earn customer trust and manage reputational risk by collecting and honoring customer consent and protecting data from improper access and use. Your automotive organization must simultaneously protect customer privacy, comply with rigorous, diverse regulatory constraints (including GDPR, CCPA, and the EU Data Act), and provide high-quality data quickly to engineers, service technicians, dealers, and customers. You must also decide whether you can safely monetize vehicle data in a way that is consistent with your brand values, your data security and privacy policies, and customer consent. Challenges include the following:

Traditional Automotive Data Pipelines Are Overwhelmed

Traditional automotive data pipelines are being overwhelmed because they were not built to handle these progressively more rigorous and challenging requirements:

  • Volume: Connected vehicles generate terabytes of data daily from hundreds of sensors

  • Velocity: Real-time processing required for ADAS and autonomous driving features

  • Variety: Structured data (CRM, sales), semi-structured (service records), unstructured (images, video)

  • Veracity: Ensuring data quality from millions of vehicles in diverse conditions

  • Value: Extracting actionable insights from massive datasets

Siloed Systems Prevent Comprehensive Views

Traditional systems are typically siloed. To provide a comprehensive view of the relevant data and the individual customer or vehicle, modern systems must be integrated and interoperable:

  • Engineering Silos: Telemetry data isolated from quality and warranty systems

  • Customer Silos: Sales data disconnected from service history and satisfaction metrics

  • Geographic Silos: Regional systems that don’t share data across markets

  • Vendor Silos: Supplier data not integrated with OEM systems

  • Temporal Silos: Historical data separated from real-time streams

Single-Modality Systems Can’t Handle Modern Requirements

Traditional systems are often organized around a single data modality. Modern systems must be inherently multimodal:

  • Sensor Fusion: Combining camera, radar, lidar, and ultrasonic data for autonomous driving

  • Customer 360: Integrating sales, service, telemetry, and digital interaction data

  • Predictive Maintenance: Merging telemetry, service records, and parts failure data

  • Quality Analysis: Combining manufacturing data, warranty claims, and customer feedback

  • Market Intelligence: Integrating internal data with external sources (weather, traffic, social media)

Legacy Infrastructure Can’t Scale

Traditional systems were not designed to handle data at the scale and velocity required of modern systems:

  • Batch Processing: Nightly ETL jobs can’t support real-time analytics

  • Monolithic Databases: Single databases can’t handle petabytes of vehicle data

  • On-Premises Limits: Fixed infrastructure can’t elastically scale for peak loads

  • Manual Processes: Human-driven data pipelines create bottlenecks

  • Rigid Schemas: Difficulty adapting to new sensor types and data formats

On-Premises Constraints Limit Innovation

Traditional systems are typically designed to run on premises and are optimized for available IT resources. Modern systems must be able to take advantage of data storage and processing resources in hybrid on-premises–cloud environments and sometimes multicloud environments:

  • Capacity Planning: Over-provisioning for peak loads wastes resources

  • Geographic Distribution: Difficulty processing data close to where vehicles operate

  • Disaster Recovery: Complex and expensive backup and recovery procedures

  • Innovation Speed: Months to provision new infrastructure for experiments

  • Cost Structure: High capital expenditure with long depreciation cycles

Regulatory Complexity Increases Risk

Modern automotive organizations face unprecedented regulatory complexity:

  • EU Data Act: Mandates customer access to vehicle-generated data

  • GDPR: Requires consent management and right to erasure

  • CCPA: California privacy requirements for customer data

  • Regional Variations: Different requirements across markets

  • Evolving Standards: Continuous updates to compliance requirements

Automotive organizations that adopt and run on a modern automotive data mesh strategy position themselves to advance as innovation accelerates in connected vehicles, autonomous driving, and customer experience.

The Challenge: Traditional Data Architectures Don’t Scale

Traditional centralized data architectures create bottlenecks that prevent automotive organizations from realizing the full value of their data:

Organizational Bottlenecks

  • Central IT Dependency: All data requests flow through a central data team, creating delays and limiting domain expertise

  • Lack of Domain Ownership: Teams closest to the data (engineering, service, sales) don’t control their data products

  • Siloed Data: Customer data, vehicle telemetry, service records, and sales data remain isolated in separate systems

  • Slow Time-to-Insight: Weeks or months to provision new data products or analytics capabilities

Technical Limitations

  • Monolithic Data Warehouses: Single databases struggle with the volume and variety of automotive data

  • Rigid Schemas: Difficulty adapting to new data types from evolving vehicle sensors and systems

  • Limited Scalability: Cannot handle real-time streaming data from millions of connected vehicles

  • Complex ETL Pipelines: Brittle, hard-to-maintain data pipelines that break with schema changes

Governance Challenges

  • Inconsistent Policies: Different teams apply different security and privacy controls

  • Compliance Risks: Difficulty ensuring GDPR, CCPA, and EU Data Act compliance across all data

  • Limited Visibility: No central catalog of what data exists and who has access

  • Audit Complexity: Tracking data lineage and access across siloed systems

Why Data Mesh is the Solution

A data mesh architecture addresses these challenges through four core principles that we’ll explore in detail in the next section.